Rossera, a specialist consultancy in Oracle applications, deliver scalable integration solutions, focused on a reusable, silo-free framework approach.
It aligns with business objectives, underpinned with architectural principles, and implements governance mechanisms to enforce and enable effective integration lifecycle management on Oracle Integration Cloud.
Rossera’s Integration Platform engineering enablement built-in, Scaffold-Once supports common integration patterns, styles and service types, centralizes orchestration, offers monitoring and observability capabilities and offers pre-packaged recipes and accelerators.
Explore related questions
Benefits include lock-out common integration style pitfalls (antipatterns) and lock-in best practice, standards and reuse, drive down repetition, increased developer productivity, faster solution delivery to market and improved business outcomes.
Using these tools, organizations can elevate their ERP integration strategy to get the most out of their business and enhance operations to boost growth and productivity.
This strategy can help businesses by improving performance, increasing agility, eliminating errors and increasing competitiveness. It includes B2B integration and vertical and horizontal integration.
However, without a defined strategy to optimize integration services for ERP, businesses can struggle with the following issues:
Integration sprawl: Which occurs when numerous integration projects lead to redundant connections, overlapping functionalities and higher maintenance overhead.
Inconsistent standards: A lack of clear design, implementation, and deployment standards can result in weak naming conventions, data formats, error handling and security.
Poor reusability: Integrations developed in silos without considering opportunities for reuse and missed opportunities to leverage common integration components, lead to duplicated efforts and inefficiencies.
Scalability challenges: Integrations delivered without a clear strategy may not be designed with scalability in mind giving rise to performance issues, bottlenecks, and limitations in handling increasing volumes of data and transactions as the organization grows.
Technical debt: Without proper architectural governance, integrations may be developed with shortcuts or workarounds to meet immediate requirements, leading to accrued technical debt, which can accumulate over time.
Security vulnerabilities: Weak architectural governance may yield integrations being developed without adequate consideration for security best practices. This can introduce vulnerabilities such as data exposure, unauthorized access and compliance risks.
Lack of visibility and control: Without a clear integration strategy and governance framework, organizations may struggle to maintain visibility and control over their integration landscape causing challenges in tracking integration assets, monitoring performance, enforcing policies, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
Complexity and confusion: In the absence of a coherent integration strategy, organizations may end up with a complex and fragmented integration landscape. This complexity can lead to confusion among development teams, stakeholders, and end-users, hindering collaboration and alignment across the organization.
