Nonprofits Want AI, but They Need Modern ERP Platforms First—Unit4 Study

NGO AI ERP

Key Takeaways

Nonprofits are modernizing their operational frameworks to maximize their resources, with 83% planning to invest in AI technologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Siloed information and fragmented systems are significant challenges for nonprofits, with many organizations struggling to align headquarters' priorities with frontline mission outcomes due to manual workflows and a lack of real-time data access.

The strategic choice between an integrated ERP and AI platform versus a federated, best-of-breed stack is critical for nonprofits; both options aim to enhance data visibility, governance, and mission alignment.

Nonprofits are running into hard operational limits. They must meet surging demand driven by humanitarian and environmental crises, while managing economic uncertainty, unpredictable donors, and rising operating costs.

Many see AI as a gamechanger. According to a new study from IDC and Unit4, titled Mission Impact Through Unified Insight: Modernizing the Nonprofit Enterprise, 83% of nonprofits surveyed have investment planned for generative AI, and 67% have plans to utilize predictive AI tools. Modernizing back offices is often the first step.

AI-enabled ERP can unify financial, HR, procurement, and program data so leadership teams can see, and act on, the full picture. “Given all the volatility nonprofits face, it is understandable they view AI as a vital way to maximize their available resources,” said Rafael Artacho, director AI product incubation, Unit4.

Artacho elaborated, “Larger organizations may be slightly further ahead in assessing the technology, but this is also a great opportunity for smaller organizations who can adopt AI integrations as part of packaged solutions tailored to their specific sector and needs.”

Silos Undercut Mission Impact

Nonprofits reported that fundraising (40%), financial sustainability (34%), demonstrating mission impact (31%), and operational risks in the field (24%) were among their organizations’ top strategic challenges.

The data hints at a binary between headquarters-led priorities, like fundraising and financial sustainability, and frontline concerns about mission outcomes and field risk in beneficiary communities. It also illustrates why over a third of organizations highlighted siloed information, fragmented systems, and inadequate observability as challenges.

When it came to ERP management, respondents from medium-sized nonprofits, with between 250 and 999 employees, said poorly managed workflows increased compliance risk (36%), manual process were too time-consuming (32%), visibility into processes were lacking (28%), and the inaccessibility of real-time data (28%) were bottlenecks.

Respondents from large nonprofits, with more than 1,000 employees, cited the inaccessibility of real-time data (36%) as a top concern, while time-consuming manual processes (33%) and cumbersome financial reporting processes (31%) followed.

The findings show nonprofits want systems that match their reality. Many fundraise from, and report to, donors who expect private sector–grade transparency and responsiveness.

Meeting those expectations is hard enough in the best of conditions. It becomes even harder when teams rely on legacy ERP platforms and manual workarounds, while coordinating across crisis-affected countries and restrictive regulatory regimes.

The Next Nonprofit ERP

In the survey, every organization said it plans to integrate finance and HR, 90% expect to bring operations and program or project management into the same backbone, and 82% intend to fold procurement, purchasing, and sourcing into a unified environment.

Unit4 wants to help nonprofits translate this momentum into practice. For nonprofit leaders, that means a strategic decision about whether an organization should pursue an integrated, sector-specific ERP and AI platform, or to build a more federated, best-of-breed stack that still delivers shared data, strong governance, and an AI-ready core.

An integrated platform promises coherence. It simplifies governance, cuts integration overhead, and makes it easier to build a single source of truth for automation, shared reporting, and consistent controls across finance, HR, and program operations.

A federated, best-of-breed stack promises flexibility. It lets nonprofits pair specialized tools with a strong financial core, but requires more integration effort, disciplined data modeling, and tighter governance to prevent silos from reappearing later.

Unit4’s nonprofit ERP is explicitly designed as the primary data and process platform for finance, HR, projects, and procurement, with AI services riding on that shared model. It can also support federated choices by exposing APIs and integration tools so nonprofits can retain specialized systems without sacrificing shared data and AI capabilities.

Whatever architecture nonprofit leaders choose, modernizing the ERP is a critical step toward meeting donor expectations for transparency, protecting field staff with better visibility, and ensuring overhead supports beneficiary communities.

What This Means for ERP Insiders

AI needs solid ERP foundations. Nonprofits cannot get full value from AI until core ERP data is integrated, clean, and accessible across finance, HR, procurement, and program teams. That shift turns today’s fragmented back offices into a single environment that reliably supports automation, analytics, and real-time decision-making.

Design architecture around the mission. The key task is shaping the right mix of integrated backbone and specialist tools so that governance, skills, and data models align with how each organization works. That way, AI projects do not have to conform to a generic platform or point-solution assumptions.

Modern ERP is mission infrastructure. Upgrading ERP is a critical step towards meeting donor expectations for transparency, as well as improving field safety and oversight through better visibility and controls. It also helps ensure administrative and fundraising costs enable, rather than distract from, the outcomes beneficiary communities experience.